Jordan Cornish, a highly recruited 6-foot-6 guard out of Brother Martin High in New Orleans, put up modest numbers in two years at UNLV after originally signing with Tennessee, but he has the potential to be a big-time player and believes he has a future in the NBA. When he decided to leave UNLV after coaching turmoil there, he never thought he would return to his hometown, but new Tulane coach Mike Dunleavy convinced him to change his mind.

Friday, I talked to Cornish and Brother Martin coach Chris Biehl. Here's the interview with Cornish, who has been accepted into Tulane.

What were the primary reasons you decided to come to Tulane?

“I wanted to find a place where I could come in with a good coaching staff and learn and just really expand my game and take it to the next level, and I absolutely think I can do that with coach Dunleavy and his staff.”

What impresses you the most about Mike Dunleavy and his staff?

“Just he’s an NBA guy and he knows what it takes (for a player to get to the NBA). He made out a blueprint for me, and I couldn’t pass up the opportunity.”

Did you even consider Tulane coming out of Brother Martin High in New Orleans?

“To be honest I wouldn’t have even blinked my eye at the thought of coming to Tulane, but with coach Dunleavy being here and his staff, you can tell the changes already. You know he’s going to come in and change the program (180 degrees).”

Is there any chance you can appeal having to sit out a year under transfer rules considering the coaching changes at UNLV?

“NCAA rules I have to sit out because obviously last year I played every game. I have to sit out.”

Your coach at UNLV got fired in January, then the coach they hired as his replacement bolted after one week to go to Texas Tech. What have the last few months been like for you?

“Oh man, the last few months have been very lengthy to say the least. It’s been rough, but God does everything for a reason. I went to Jamaica with my family to get away from things, and even then, Tulane wasn’t anywhere in the picture. I got the call from coach Dunleavy to come visit, and when I left here (Tulane), I told my parents I was coming home.”

When did Dunleavy contact you for the first time?

“Mid-May, maybe. He said I had a chance to play for an NBA coach and an NBA coaching staff and guys who had been around the game who could get me to the next level that me and him both know that I can play at.”

UNLV moved you to point guard this past year, a role that you had never performed. What do you see as your role at Tulane?

“Just a guy that can play all three positions—point guard, shooting guard, wing. I’m a guy that can move around a lot to get guys involved scoring the basketball and doing all those things.”

What is your best asset?

“I would say shooting the ball and getting guys the ball. I’m a very, very unselfish player.”

Guerry,
I hate to do this again on this forum but I can't find another way. I tried to contact Rivals and got nowhere. It seems all contact is via email. I asked for a # so that I could talk with someone re: my concerns about the recruiting info and was told there is no phone #..I am old school and it bothers the heck out of me that I can't talk with someone. Is there a way I can contact you, even if by email, regarding my concern about the recruiting info?
Again sorry to use this space. Thanks for your help in advance.
Ernie

Guerry,
Sorry to ask this here but I can't seem to find another place. Before when I went to look at recruits for Tulane I would click on recruit search and database. It would bring up an entire page with either individual info or team info if you click a specific team. It was great I could click TU and see that they had 171 candidates and then I could go to specific positions and see who TU was recruiting at each position. Now when I click on that spot I get sent to Rivals site and it is only for specific players, who may or may not be being recruited by TU.
Can you explain the change? Without the specific TU info half of why I am on this site becomes moot.
Thanks for your insight. Sorry to have used this space to get this info.
Ernie

Guerry,
I hate to do this again on this forum but I can't find another way. I tried to contact Rivals and got nowhere. It seems all contact is via email. I asked for a # so that I could talk with someone re: my concerns about the recruiting info and was told there is no phone #..I am old school and it bothers the heck out of me that I can't talk with someone. Is there a way I can contact you, even if by email, regarding my concern about the recruiting info?
Again sorry to use this space. Thanks for your help in advance.
Ernie

is it true that Dan Heffner at Dallas Baptist was an assistant at Northern Iowa while Dannen was AD? If so this could be an intriguing name.

Tulane is the highest profile job available right now with Texas concluding their search. What names will that draw? How long will the process take.

I was pretty sure Tulane would not lose David Pierce to Texas because I had been told (correctly) the Longhorns were convinced they needed a coach who had gone to the College Worlds Series and competed for national championships. My source was right, but after Texas struck out on at least six and possibly eight candidates (Mainieri, Schlossnagle, Florida, Virginia, Louisville, Oregon State, UCLA at the minimum), Pierce is back in the picture, as others have reported.

At this point, the smart choice would be Pierce, but I still have a feeling he won't get the offer. Houston's Todd Whitting reportedly was interviewed as well as Pierce, and Whitting won a super regional in Baton Rouge two years ago before losing in three to Texas in a super regional. He also is nine years younger than Pierce. There is some bad blood between Tulane and Houston as baseball programs, making this situation even more interesting.

Oklahoma State coach Josh Holliday, who is pursuing a national championship in the CWS, could still emerge as a viable candidate, too.

If Pierce gets the offer, I can't imagine him turning it down, but nothing is ever certain.

Fishers, Ind., four-star safety R.J. Potts was offered by Tulane in May. His sister is Tulane shot putter Taylor Potts. R.J. has been down to the school and says that connection with definitely get him to consider Tulane going forward. I wrote about that in an article I put out on R.J. today:

https://n.rivals.com/news/the-latest-on-four-star-db-r-j-potts

Mallory, a 6-3, 270-pound prospect from Guyer High in Denton, Texas, had offers from Fresno State and apparently Tulsa among others. He is in the Rivals database but with virtually no information and no stars, fitting the profile of the the recruits Willie Fritz and company are bringing in. He plays center for Guyer but likely will be a guard in college and should be a good fit for what the coaches want to do with the running game.

Particularly with offensive linemen, recruiting service ratings won't mean much because option-based systems want mobile blockers who do not necessarily project as NFL prospects.

Mallory's team went 10-4 last year, reaching the Division II regional final in Class 6A, scoring a lot of points while rolling up more than 500 yards per game on the ground in its first three playoff victories before losing 44-7 to Mansfield. Getting that far in the playoffs was unexpected.

Here's a story from the playoff loss, although it does not mention Mallory.

http://www.dentonrc.com/sports/spor...ters-from-playoffs-with-loss-to-mansfield.ece

“Star” inflation has pretty much gotten out of control. By my count, Tulane has now offered at least 237 high school players across the nation, with more seemingly every day. Rivals has rated 178 of them, giving 131 of them 3 or more stars. That’s 73.5%. But that’s not particularly high. Scout has rated 121, issuing 110 3+ stars for a 90.9% rate. ESPN is a perfect 85 for 85 in those they’ve rated, with every kid getting at least 3 stars. And, 247, who many people now swear by, has rated 149 players from our “offer list.” They’ve rate 148 of them (all but one kid by my count) as a 3 star or higher. Of course, a large number of kids have not been listed or, if listed, not rated by the services. Eventually, virtually everyone who signs with a D-1 school will get a rating. Those who don’t sign will generally be downgraded to 2 stars and those with no ratings will suddenly become 2 or 3 stars without, best I can tell, any analysis other than “who they signed with.” That ESPN and 247 have the nerve to differentiate each level by dividing them into 10 separate ratings is beyond ridiculous. And I simply can’t duplicate 247’s supposed “consensus” rating with anything I find from other sites. There is some “magic” going on there, too.

Looking at Tulane’s recent history, I chose to only view Rivals, since they, at least, have some differentiation between star levels. And, we haven’t fared very well. Only 25 of the 103 high schoolers we’ve signed since 2012 were awarded 3 stars by Rivals (less than 25%).

In 2012, Toledo recruited four players who eventually signed with Tulane with 3 stars: Doss, Thompson, Jacquet, and Van Hooser. CJ came on to sign Monroe (4 stars), LaFrance, and Batiste, who each had 3 stars.

In 2013, CJ signed Edward Williams, Tanzel, Smart, Santa Marina, Badie, Chris Taylor, and Brandon Godfrey.

In 2014, he signed Diaz, Veal, Marbley, Ardoin, and Cuiellette

In 2015, he signed Darius Wiliams, Leeward Brown, and Nigel Anderson

And in 2016, none of the recruits who committed to CJ who eventually signed were awarded 3 stars. Fritz, however, despite a late start, brought on Tre Jackson, P.J. Hall, and Jacob Robertson, who were all three stars.

The interesting thing is that many of the 3-stars through the years didn’t or haven’t to date done much. And several left early. From 2012, Van Hooser was injured and Jacquet hardly played until his fourth year. Batiste, of course, after a good start, left the program. From 2013, Williams and Godfrey also left early and Santa Marina hasn’t played much entering his redshirt junior season. From 2014, Diaz became a starter after a redshirt year. Veal played well before departing and Ardoin, after a redshirt year, has split time at TE with two other guys. Cuiellette has yet to prove anything. The 2015 class only retains Leeward Brown and none of the “three stars” from that class has yet seen the field. And, of course, we all hope the 2016 class can make a real difference. To me, it is our best class in years.

As to 2017, the jury is obviously still out. With the number of camps our coaches have attended, they have seen literally thousands of kids who they’ve measured, timed, and interviewed. They clearly know more about these players than any of the recruiting services. On the downside, these multi-school camps have given many other schools the same opportunity to evaluate players and, to date, most of our commitments have not impressed many schools at the G5 or P5 level.

Stay tuned, a lot will happen between now and February.

Roll Wave!!!

I received an email from the athletic department, something about a "Big Reveal" next week....
I am thinking it may have something to do with an athletic village, football locker room renovation (which should be underway already by the way)...who knows what else. Exciting times around here...

We’ve offered well over 200 high school players for 2017. I have no idea how many of those are serious, committable offers. Regardless, quite a few are to players who would obviously be “great gets.” But, seriously, 4 and 5 star recruits with offers from Alabama, Ohio State, Notre Dame, and 20+ other P5 programs are HIGHLY unlikely to come to Tulane. Louisiana kids with LSU offers are in the same category. It’s always a possibility, but not probable. So, in reviewing highlights from all of our “offerees” I’ve put together a list of kids who I think are underappreciated by the recruiting services and/or college recruiters. Of course, unlike those recruiters, I haven’t weighed them, timed them, measured them, or interviewed them. And I’m not aware of any academic or legal circumstances that would disqualify them from consideration. They simply look pretty good to me. Whether any of them are seriously considering the Wave or high on Coach Fritz’s list is also a mystery. Anyway, to my list:

Will Wallace is a DE/TE from Natchez, MS. He’s received one P5 offer from Kansas and a number of G5 offers. He’s generally listed as 6’5” and about 245#. If you look at his highlights (http://www.hudl.com/athlete/2980595/highlights/321308398), he’s a terror at defensive end and a ferocious blocker on offense. At a recent Rivals camp, he showed what he can do as a receiver also (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwkGBqfVcj4). It starts at about the 1 minute point. In a recent tweet he commented, “loved my visit to Tulane.” I’d love to get him, though the “squeamish” might be turned off since he’s rated only a 2 star by Rivals and Scout, and receives the standard 3 stars from 247. My guess is that he’ll receive many more offers; I hope we get him.

Gregory White is a lanky 6’3, 180# WR from Riverdale, GA. He purportedly runs a 4.5 40. I’d guess it’s closer to 4.6. From his highlights (http://www.hudl.com/athlete/2828592/highlights/331271433), he uses his size and body well against smaller defenders and blocks well downfield. He’s received one P5 offer from North Carolina and several G5 offers, but looks like the kind of player Coach Fritz would like. He’s rated a 3 star by 247 (nothing new there) but a 2 star by Scout and Rivals.

Andre Landry, is a good sized DT at 6’5” 260#, who also plays TE on offense for a good Acadiana team. He is either ignored or has no rating from any of the recruiting services but placed at #48 in James Smith’s most recent “Nifty 50” of Louisiana recruits. I haven’t seen a 40 time on him but he looks pretty quick on his highlights playing both DT and DE (http://www.hudl.com/athlete/3905835/highlights/307380386). He also plays TE but I’ve seen no film at that position. He has offers from Texas Tech and Kansas State and several G5 schools. We need at least one more DT and I’d be happy with him.

Da’Vontavean Martin is from Houma (Ellender HS) and is another lanky WR at 6’4,” 170#. He uses his height to advantage on “jump balls” and when covered one on one near the goal line, the matchup is laughingly unfair. In his highlights (http://www.hudl.com/athlete/3305159/highlights/308966423), he also takes a direct snap out of the shotgun and in another receives a backwards “pass” that he then completes for a long gain downfield. He appears a little “raw” but his height and speed make him a good prospect in my view. He’s currently unrated by Scout, ESPN, and 247 and receives 2 stars from Rivals and has no P5 offers. I think he’s being overlooked.

Shahid Reece, is a linebacker from Brother Martin who is listed at 6’0” and 220#. He’s received the standard 3 stars from 247 and 2 stars from Rivals while not being rated by Scout or ESPN. He’s also received little recruiting interest other than Tulane and a couple of other G5 schools. But, on his highlights (http://www.hudl.com/athlete/4409838/highlights/297886467), he avoids blockers and runs to the ball well. He also makes several nice interceptions off of “tipped balls.” He reminds me a lot of Eric Thomas, which isn’t all bad. He’s probably not quite 6’0” but I think he would make a good signee.

Kayce Medlock, is a smallish RB at 5’9” and 186# from Arp, TX. He ran a 4.40 40 at a combine and in his highlights is clearly the fastest man on the field; he runs away from everyone. He is primarily used as wing back (slot back?) in a double wing T formation though he sometimes takes a direct snap from a shotgun formation. He’s rated a high 3 star by Rivals and a 2 star by Scout while receiving the standard 3 stars from 247 and no notice from ESPN. The best I can tell, he’s receive one P5 offer from Colorado and several G5 offers, including, obviously, Tulane. He looks good to me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7nWr31_RXA

Avery Showell is a really good-sized DB at 6’2” and 195# from Alpharetta, GA. He purportedly runs a 4.50 40 and his highlights support something in that range. He’s rated a 3 star by Scout but is unrated, though listed, by the other three services. He also has a number of P5 offers from the likes of Minnesota, West Virginia, Wake Forest, and Rutgers-- schools we must start defeating in the recruiting game. Most of his highlights show him at safety though he occasionally moves into a “cover” corner position. He appears to be a solid tackler and makes some nice plays on throws in his zone. http://www.hudl.com/athlete/3986901/highlights/286771379

Chris Ross is from Enterprise, AL. At 6’1” and 195#, he plays strong safety and outside linebacker in his highlights (http://www.hudl.com/athlete/3851096/highlights/315632382). In those he shows explosive speed (claims a 4.43 40) and terrific reactions and coverage skills as well as solid tackling. He’s rated a 2 star by Scout and I haven’t found him in the data provided by the other three services, so he’s relatively unknown, though he has offers from the likes of Southern Miss and others in the G5 schools.

I really haven’t found any “diamonds in the rough” at QB or Offensive Line though, from what I’ve seen, both Ledford at QB and Charlie Clark at OL, two of our commitments, would qualify. We certainly have offered some highly thought of QB’s and OL’s, so those key positions still have many possibilities.

Anyway, Roll Wave!!

By my count, we have 79 players currently on scholarship, 11 of whom are seniors. That would mean we have at least 17 openings for the class signing in February 2017. We have an additional 14 redshirt juniors (Kenneth Santa Marina, Sherman Badie, Serge Medina, Eldrick Washington, Eric Bell, Jason Stewart, Ade Aruna, Luke Jackson, Quinlan Carroll, Parry Nickerson, Jarod Franklin, Tristan Cooper, William Townsend, and Leonard Davis). Some of these are major contributors; some have contributed very little to this point. But, after four years in school, with graduation in sight, I expect some of these young men will be departing either voluntarily to get on with their lives, or with a gentle push. We can also expect some attrition from other underclassmen-- injuries/illness, academics, and a simple “lack of willingness”-- almost always affect a few players annually. To me, that suggests we should be able to sign at least 20 kids next February and probably more, maybe a lot more.

For 2016, we signed 23 players after eliminating the recently de-committed AJ Walker. Two players chose to enroll early, thereby counting towards 2015. That means we have four possible slots for “early enrollees” for 2017 and the potential to sign as many as 29 if early enrollees and openings on the roster permit. At this point, I’d guess we’ll sign close to 25, but there are too many variables to make a truly educated analysis. Regardless, it would be nice to sign at least a couple of kids who enroll early because we could have the potential for a really big class in 2018.

With data provided from a variety of sources, I think we’ve offered at least 220 or so kids for 2017. Of those, we’ve got six public commitments, which may or may not be “firm.” And at least 73 others we’ve offered have already committed elsewhere. Again, the firmness of such commitments is not always clear. Significant, I think, is that roughly 75% of all the kids we have offered have also receive offers from P5 schools. So, we’re not afraid to compete. Unfortunately, our six successes to date (actual commitments) are all from players with no P5 offers and, in some cases, no other G5 offers either. It’s hard to put a good spin on that. Nonetheless, after watching film of each, I think all have potential, and I like the offensive lineman, Charlie Clark, a lot. I also like the DE/TE who recently committed, Evan Reese. That said, none of them are as impressive to me as several kids Coach Fritz signed late last year.

Most of us think we need help in the offensive line, at QB, and, by next year, at running back. To me, those positions could take as many as 10 or more of our incoming class. But, based on the number of offers (not necessarily a good indicator), those are not the positions we are pursuing the most heavily. Roughly half of our offers are to “athletes,” wide receivers, and defensive backs.

We have offered close to 20 QB’s/ATH’s, 23 RB’s, and 28 Offensive linemen (at least 71 total). Of course, the right 1-2 QB’s, 2-3 RB’s, and 4-5 OL’s would probably meet our needs.

On the defensive line, we’ve offered at least 24 players I believe are defensive ends and only 10 who I’d classify as defensive tackles. The latter is a surprise to me. With the departure of Tanzel Smart after this season, we’ll only have Sean Wilson as the only (to date) proven player on the interior defense. Eldrick Washington, Eric Bell, John Washington, and Brayton Edwards fill out our “depth chart” and I doubt all of them will be back for 2017. We NEED at least two more in my view.

We also probably need two linebackers to replace our seniors, Marley and Thomas, and we’ve offered at least 25.

We’ve also offered at least one kicker (he committed to Georgia Tech) and a couple of tight ends, though I ‘d hope we eventually sign at least one of the latter.

I look at our recruiting in more detail later.

Roll Wave

I am on vacation in Destin until next Friday and was not able to reach Sturdivant today after his commitment (I should be able go get in touch with him by Monday), but Tulane got another recruit from Hoover High near Birmingham, Ala., joining DB P.J. Hall, who will be a freshman this fall.

Unlike Hall, a heralded 3-star recruit, Sturdivant is under the radar and did not have any other significant offers yet although Southern Miss was looking at him. He is 5-10, 189-pound north and south runner who gained 695 yards (5.1 average) with nine touchdowns last year according to Al.com. He is not fast (4.6 40), but clearly Willie Fritz and his staff feel like he will be a good fit for Tulane.

Hoover went 10-3 last year, losing to crosstown Spain Park twice, including 7-6 in the semifinals of the Class 7A state playoffs as Hoover failed to defend its championship from 2014. Hoover also had won state titles in 2012 and 13.

Tulane now has four commitments, all from different states with Texas, Alabama, Georgia and Louisiana represented. Of the four, John Ehret CB Darius Campbell has two stars and the others are unrated by Rivals. We'll see if that changes in the next few months and some of these guys get upgrades.

Strange ending to the LSU-Coastal Carolina game tonight with both teams blowing chances late before Coastal Carolina got the job done in the bottom of the ninth.

At the start of yesterday it looked like Tulane might have gone 5-1 against College World Series teams with a win over Arizona, two wins out of three against East Carolina and two wins against LSU. Instead, the Wave will settle for being 1-0.

Coastal Carolina is simply a better team than LSU, and now the SEC might get shut out of the College World Series while the Big 12 got all three of its entrants in Omaha. I'm pretty sure Florida will beat FSU tomorrow to give the SEC one entrant, but very little has gone as expected this weekend.

Either way, the two dominant conferences this year will have a combined two teams in Omaha with Miami and the winner of Florida-FSU even though almost all of them played at home throughout the postseason. What an epic fail.

What are you hearing on Pierce leaving. First it was Alabama this morning and this afternoon sources say he's close to signing with Texas. I'm not sure of the reliability of the sources. The bama one came from tigerdroppings. Not panicking as it's a good job and they'll be a host of very qualified candidates. Just curious.

Rogers went at No. 97 to the Astros, and Alemais went at 105 to the Pirates. They are as good as gone. No surprise there.

I was surprised that seven college catchers were taken before Rogers, whose defensive skills are off the charts, but his batting average scared away a lot of teams. Not many college players who hit .200 in conference play every make the Major Leagues, but hopefully he will be the exception. As he showed in the 9th inning at Ole Miss, he is better than his numbers indicate.

I also was surprised that no college shortstop went in the top 50. I guess the elite high school shortstops--the best player on most teams plays shortstop at that level--head straight to professional ball, but I admit I haven't paid enough attention to know the answer. Alemais was the fourth college shortstop taken. He has a level swing and the superior athletic ability that will help in the minor leagues, but he has to clean up the errors and sloppy footwork that got him in trouble from time to time.

There are no real facts in the story as it relates to Pierce, and the idea that Tulane is a small baseball program like Dallas Baptist ignores history, but obviously Texas would be very intriguing to Pierce and maybe a can't- turn-down offer if he got it.

http://www.burntorangenation.com/20...ce-texas-longhorns-baseball-tulane-kevin-osul

Tulane faced three pitchers who were taken in the first round of the MLB draft. That's unusual.

Justin Dunn, who was picked 19th, dominated the Wave in the opener of the Oxford regional.

Cody Sedlock, from Illinois, gave up two runs (one earned) in six innings of the season opener and had a no decision. He was taken 27th.

Anthony Kay, from UConn, gave up two hits in seven innings while striking out eight, but he did allow a grand slam to Grant Witherspoon after walking the bases loaded.

I already like the Mike Dunleavy era because the shroud of secrecy has been lifted. Inexplicably, Tulane always was one of the last handful of teams in the country to release its non-conference schedule under Ed Conroy. I never figured out what the deal was, and I know it irritated a former basketball SID to no end when the the coaches would have the schedule in hand but refuse to let him release it until some point in August.

As for the actual schedule, getting North Carolina to play in the Smoothie King Center is cool, and playing in a real tournament instead of those artificial ones Tulane signed up for in the past few years is nice. The Wave will play three games in Puerto Rico with first through eighth place determined by results against a good field --Oklahoma, Xavier, Arizona State, Clemson, Northern Iowa (Dannen's old schools), Missouri and Davidson are the other teams in the tournament, with no pairings announced yet.

The rest of the schedule is humdrum but still an improvement on what Tulane usually faced under Conroy.

Keeping in mind that outside of the AAC and a few teams in the SEC, I cannot name one player in college baseball, here are my predictions for each of the 16 regionals. Sometimes I think it helps to know so little about the players because it takes away all the bias I exhibit when I pick the NCAA basketball tournament, usually favoring the players I like.

OXFORD REGIONAL

The pick: Ole Miss
second choice: Tulane

Analysis: If Tulane hits and gets terrific performances from its starting pitchers, it will have an excellent chance to win a regional for the first time in 11 years. The presence of sterling defensive catcher Jake Rogers gives the Wave a huge advantage. But Ole Miss easily could have been a national seed and will be playing at home in front of rowdy fans. The Rebels are the safe pick. I do believe Utah has a reasonable chance to knock off the Rebels. The Utes crushed the ball during their practice today but have to fight the "happy to be here" syndrome.

CORAL GABLES REGIONAL

The pick: Miami
second choice: no one.

Analysis: I'm not saying the Hurricanes are a lock to win, just that I'm not impressed with the other three teams in the regional. Maybe one of them will prove me wrong and step up and beat the Hurricanes, which would guarantee Tulane a home super regional if it wins in Oxford. Despite winning Conference USA, FAU likely is the fourth best team in that league. Long Beach State, the No. 3 seed, is part of a weak West Coast contingent.

LAFAYETTE REGIONAL

The pick: Louisiana-Lafayette
second choice: Sam Houston State

Analysis: I was impressed by ULL in both games against Tulane this year, and the rest of the Cajuns' regional is week. Arizona finished fourth in a down year for the Pac-12. Sam Houston State is white hot right now but not particularly talented. And if that team could not win a regional in three years under David Pierce, it's hard to see it winning one without him.

STARKVILLE REGIONAL

The pick: Mississippi State
second choice: Louisiana Tech

Analysis: Because of history, a lot of people are high on Cal St. Fullerton. Have they paid attention to West Coast baseball this year? This is hardly a vintage Fullerton team, although its pitching numbers are excellent. La Tech, which has not been to a regional since 1987, got hot at the end of the year and can ride that momentum to an upset of the Titans, but no one is beating Mississippi State here.

CLEMSON REGIONAL

The pick: Clemson
second choice: no one

Analysis: Are you kidding me? Okahoma State was the third best team in a down year for the Big 12. Nebraska was the least deserving at-large team in the field and is below .500 against top-100 RPI teams. Clemson caught fire late in the year and should roll through this regional.

COLUMBIA REGIONAL

The pick: South Carolina
second choice: UNC Wilmington

Analysis: Probably another cakewalk, and yes, I realize I've picked all No. 1 seeds so far. I like picking upsets, but this has been a top-heavy year in college baseball. UNCW, as we all know after last year's Baton Rouge regional, can rake, but it gave up 13 runs to South Carolina in a loss earlier this year and has a weak pitching staff. Duke is the least talented of the 10 ACC teams that made the NCAA field.

NASHVILLE REGIONAL

The pick: Vanderbilt
second choice: no one

Vanderbilt would be very vulnerable if it had not been handed such a weak group of opponents. The Commodores won only one series against an NCAA tournament team. But UCSB, the No. 3 seed, barely finished above .500 in the Big West, played poorly down the stretch and lost almost all of the best players from a more formidable team that hosted a regional and flopped a year ago. Washington gave up more than 30 runs in the last 10 innings to Utah last weekend. I actually could see Xavier, which is barely above .500 but got hot in the last month, upsetting Vandy in the opener, but the Commodores probably would win four straight anyway.

LOUISVILLE REGIONAL

The pick: Louisville
second choice: Ohio State

Ohio State I definitely would have picked in a few other regionals--the Buckeyes were by far the best team in the Big Ten down the stretch--but Louisville lost only one home game all year. The bottom two teams appear weak for their seeds--Wright State at No. 3 and Western Michigan, a MAC bottom feeder that won its league tournament, at No. 4.

COLLEGE STATION REGIONAL

The pick: Texas A&M
second choice: puh-leez

What do you get when you combine one of the hottest teams in the country with pitiful opposition? A weekend of blowouts at Texas A&M. Minnesota won the Big Ten, which is the only reason the Gophers received an at-large bid with an RPI in the 50s. Good for former UNO coach Tom Walter at finally guiding Wake Forest to the NCAA tournament in his seventh year on the job, but the Demon Deacons don't scare anyone except for No. 4 seed Binghamton.

FORT WORTH REGIONAL

The pick: TCU
Second choice: Oral Roberts

I would not be surprised if Oral Roberts puts a huge scare into TCU on opening night, but the Horned Frogs are too well coached, even in a rebuilding year, to lose twice at home. The No. 2 seed, Arizona State, gave up 31 runs to USC on Sunday. The No. 3 seed, Gonzaga, earned its at-large bid by being road warriors while playing only 10 home games, but the talent level is not there. Look for 4 seed Oral Roberts in the championship round but for TCU to advance.

CHARLOTTSVILLE REGIONAL

The pick: Virginia
second choice: East Carolina

It would be funny if Virginia fell short at home a year after winning the College World Series after beginning regional play as a No. 3 seed in California. It might happen, but I can't pull the trigger. I like East Carolina to knock off No. 2 seed Bryant behind terrific pitcher Evan Kruczynski, but the Pirates played their best ball earlier in the year. A lot of experts say Bryant is dangerous, but I can't get past the ridiculously weak schedule that led to it having the nation's best winning percentage.

LUBBOCK REGIONAL

The pick: Dallas Baptist
Second choice: Texas Tech

Finally, I go away from the chalk. Texas Tech has an all-freshman weekend starting pitching rotation and lost two straight in the Big 12 tournament. Dallas Baptist hosted a regional with a better team last year --getting upset in the championship game by 4 seed VCU--but the returning players know what it takes to win. The bottom two seeds, New Mexico and Fairfield, will be cannon fodder.

BATON ROUGE REGIONAL

The pick: LSU
second choice: Southeastern Louisiana

LSU was more vulnerable last year and still cruised through its regional while hardly giving up a run. No. 2 seed Rice fell apart at the end of the regular season, giving up a ton of runs, and the Owls are rarely strong offensively. Southeastern is not playing as well as it did earlier in the season, but it has the pitching and hitting to make the championship round, where its inferiority complex to LSU will kill any chance it has to win.

RALEIGH REGIONAL

The pick: Coastal Carolina
second choice: NC State

NC State is a host almost exclusively because of its RPI and stopped playing well more than a month ago. Coastal Carolina, which has been perennially strong, deservedly lost its chance to host by getting swept at Georgia Tech last month, but that's not the fair representation of the Chanticleers' ability. They just had a bad series. They'll get their ACC revenge this weekend, unless capable St. Mary's trips them up in the opener. NC State might lose to Navy on opening day. The Middies' starter had four shutouts and nine complete games this year.

TALLAHASSEE REGIONAL

The pick: FSU
Next choice: Southern Miss

This is another vulnerable host I can't pick against because of its regional opponents. Southern Miss, a Tiger at home, has a losing record on the road. South Alabama, which swept a pair of midweek games against the Golden Eagles, has not won a weekend series in more than a month. Fourth seed Alabama State is intriguing after destroying the SWAC, winning all 28 games, usually by lopsided margins. I could see FSU losing its opener to Alabama State, then rebounding to win the regional anyway. Southern Miss has the offense to get to a super regional, but it's doubtful to happen in Tallahassee.

GAINESVILLE REGIONAL

The pick: Florida
second choice: Connecticut

This is the most interesting regional outside of the Oxford regional because of the real possibility of a shocking upset. Florida was No. 1 almost all year and is loaded, but if UConn gets past slumping Georgia Tech Friday, I really like the Huskies to beat Florida on Saturday behind AAC pitcher of the year Anthony Kay. He's unhittable when he's on, and the Gators are not a great hitting team. The problem is Florida would have to lose twice, and with the the best pitching depth in college baseball, the Gators easily could come out of the losers' bracket to win. In fact, that's what will happen.

My super regional picks are Ole Miss over Miami, Mississippi State over ULL, Clemson over South Carolina, Louisville over Vandy, Texas A&M over TCU, Virginia over Dallas Baptist, LSU over Coastal Carolina and Florida over FSU. That's five SEC teams and three ACC teams. Man do I hope I'm wrong.

My national championship pick is Florida over Louisville, but UConn could wreck those plans this weekends.

Elite Skill Development Camps

www.maximumexposurebasketball.com

These camps are ONLY for those players, who are serious about playing college basketball. All Camps are for rising 6th graders and older. The two-day camp format will be intense and players will be instructed by many of the top individual instructors in the country. Every single Camp will be run by a current or former COLLEGE coach.

Instruction will be given by ONLY current and former college basketball coaches. Campers will perform drills and skill work that they would be doing if they were current college players.

The Camp will include but not be limited to on court instruction (speed dribbling and full court moves off the dribble; half court and transition shooting; passing with a purpose; using and defending screens; ball screen actions; 3 on 3; controlled scrimmages); detailed discussion on how to put yourself in the best position to get recruited; nutrition and diet; academic evaluation and goals; and the various basketball opportunities at all collegiate levels.

At the end of each Camp, every participant is given a detailed evaluation of what they do well and what they need to work on in order to reach their dreams of playing collegiately. We will then send these evaluations out to every college coach in the country. This can be a huge help to your recruiting.

Each Camp is Two Days long, hotels and meals are the responsibility of each camper. A player may decide to attend just one day; however we highly recommend attending both if possible.

Every camper will receive an official Maximum Exposure Basketball T-Shirt.

Camp cost is $225.00 per player (for both days) or $150.00 per player (if you just attend one day). A $100.00 deposit is required to reserve your spot.

These camps will fill up extremely fast! Make sure to register now so you don’t miss your chance to participate!

CAMP DATES & LOCATIONS

June 18-19 Washington, DC

June 18-19 Atlanta, GA

June 25-26 Dallas, TX

June 25-26 Chicago, IL

July 2-3 Los Angeles, CA

July 2-3 Austin, TX

July 9-10 Tampa, FL

July 9-10 Nashville, TN

July 16-17 Atlanta, GA

July 16-17 Seattle, WA

July 23-24 Indianapolis, IN

July 23-24 Columbia, SC

July 30-31 Oakland, CA

July 30-31 Detroit, MI

August 6-7 Orlando, FL

August 6-7 Dallas, TX

August 6-7 Greensboro, NC

August 6-7 Philadelphia, PA

August 13-14 Miami, FL

August 13-14 Atlanta, GA

August 13-14 Los Angeles, CA

August 13-14 New York, NY

For more info or to register visit: www.maximumexposurebasketball.com

Just posted on Twitter...he was offered last weekend I believe. Led his team to the Texas Class 4A-D1 final this past season. 91 SPARQ rating...I think Tulane was his first FBS offer

Login to view embedded media
http://247sports.com/Player/Dane-Ledford-87959

https://n.rivals.com/content/prospects/181034

Guerry,

Do you know anything about Mr. Ledford?

https://twitter.com/daneledford3?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author

Here's what they said in the interview room a few minutes after Boston College eliminated Tulane 6-3 on Sunday night.

PIERCE

"We struggled with J.P. France today as a starter. He's been really good for us but he could not get the ball down early. You have to credit Boston College. They took the breaking balls both times we played them, and they made every play. When we made a mistake with the fastball, they hit it. I credit Boston College and I'm proud of our team for all of our accomplishments all year. Unless you win the national championship, you're going to end with a loss if you're in the postseason."

On infield errors by Stephen Alemais and Hunter Hope that led to three unearned runs:

"It's the second game of a doubleheader and I think we were beat up emotionally, and we had very little time (in between games), less than an hour to get going here. It's hard to regroup. Steph ran the ball up and we just couldn't handle another one. They were very opportunistic the entire weekend."

On the call on Alemais when he tried to get into third and what he thought about Alemais trying to get to third:

"He made the call that he saw. He saw him out and that's what he believed. I thought it was a mistake to try to advance there down by 4, but he's been an aggressive player for us since we've been at Tulane and it's kind of hard to rein him in."

On where the program is:

"It's on the uprise. We have kids who are committed.

On winning regular season championship and beating Ole Miss in hostile environment

"Winning the outright regular season championship, taking another step in a regional and playing in the championship, those are stepping stones. We'd like to have won the regional, but Boston College was better than us today."

How many of the juniors do you expect not to be back:

"The draft is next week and a lot of people will be affected, so I know we'll have some. I'll know more at that time."

WILLIAMS

on what made BC starter effective:

"He mixed up his pitches and his fastball. He made some mistakes and we just didn't capitalize on his mistakes. I thought we barreled a lot of balls today and they didn't fall. He just got us out."

On hitting three home runs in regional:

"I was seeing it pretty well and felt good out there. I wasn't trying to do too much. I was trying to find a way to help the team win, and that's all that matters. It was a tough loss."

On quick turnaround from Utah to Boston College:

"It was tough, but you have to find a way to battle through it. We had like an hour break, which is not much time to recover after being out in the heat all day. We came back and were a little flat at first, and that kind of hurt us and bit us in the end. It's definitely tough. It's not easy to have a big win like that out in the hot weather. Everybody's drained. I know Jake (Rogers) was drained out there, and we had to come back and try to win another game."

On whole year:

"It's been a great experience, but we're not satisified now though. We definitely wanted to win that regional. It was in our grasp almost. We could taste it and then we just couldn't pull it out. We'll be back. That's what we're going to do. We're going to build off this and try to move forward and keep progressing."