I was going to ask how the strength program was coming, until I read this morning the strength coach was fired. What gives.

Realistically, Lorenzo Doss is the only Tulane player with a chance to be drafted in the next two days, and even he is not a lock despite being projected as a fourth- to sixth-round pick.

At the end of spring practice I asked CJ about Doss and anyone else who would get a look from the NFL., and I don't think I ever posted his answers.

Here they are:

What are your thoughts on Doss' draft potential?

"I like what Lorenzo’s doing. He’s physical, he’s learned to be physical, he can cover and he can intercept the ball. The best thing about him is he can intercept the ball. He’s one of those guys I would definitely take a long, hard look at and I would get him if I could."

Was 2014 a learning experience for Doss? He clearly did not play as well as he did in his first two seasons.

"I would say this. One thing about that position is you definitely have to have amnesia. He has the ability to come back from some stuff. I think he’ll be good. When Doss gets with a team and gets settled in and learns what to do, I think he’ll be good."

How high do you see him going in the draft?

"You never know with the draft. If I say first round I could be wrong and if I say seventh round or free agent I could be wrong, so I don’t know. Wherever he goes, he’ll make a team and he’ll play a lot of football."

Any other possibilities for the draft for your players this year?

"(Sean)Donnelly is a big, athletic tackle and everybody wants size. I really like the athleticism of Tyler Gilbert. He may be the one guy that somebody takes a chance on. You get him in camp and you get him moving, and I think he can be something. (Matt) Marfisi is a big kid that may be able to do some stuff.

What about Taurean Nixon?

"The one thing everybody loves about T Nix is his speed. He can run and he looks good, so guys are definitely asking about him. It will be crucial for him to run well at the Pro Day. If he runs well (which he did), I think he will get a great opportunity."

We talked to Patrick Duester, Lex Kaplan and David Pierce after Sunday's loss. Here are their comments:

DUESTER

When did struggles began

"The first inning I felt fine. I only threw like five or six pitches (actually four). I felt good the first inning, and the second inning after that until I came out I threw maybe three pitches that I was satisfied with. I can’t really explain what happened after that, but I just never established any of my other pitches."

Specific problems

"Location, and my breaking ball was just spinning out of my hand. It wasn’t the tight slider that it usually is."

Houston good at plate

"Any time you face a team like this, you have to be able to hit your spot as a pitcher and you have to be committed to that spot and be able to throw a fastball and a secondary pitch, whether it be a breaking ball or changeups, for them to chase or in the strike zone, and it didn’t really happen."

No run support

"They put the runs up first. If we get two or three in the first or second inning, obviously it’s easier, but I just never gave my team a chance to win. Obviously when they put up five (runs) after three, it kind of gets down in the dugout, but we just have to stay up."

First weekend start bring any extra pressure?

"The mentality was right. I was anxious to get back out there on the mound. I hadn’t been on the mound in a while (eight days). I was ready to go, but I just didn’t have it."

Frustration of losing series after winning opener

"Coach (Phil) Haig and coach Pierce were both stressing that this was a big game. We knew it. We just have to get the next one. We have to keep playing."

KAPLAN

On Houston pitcher Seth Romero

"He had a live fast ball and was hitting some of his spots. His breaking ball was all right, but he just really commanded the fast ball. I just saw a few pitches that I could drive and was hitting the ball well today. I put a few good swings on them."

Avoiding shutout with run in 9th inning"It’s important, but we need to come out next week and do better than we did this weekend. We started off hot and we ended up losing two straight and bad at-bats and not great pitching. It just all around wasn’t a good team effort."

Frustrating losing 2 in row

"It’s very frustrating because we need to win games. We want to play in the postseason and we want to make a regional and it would be nice to be an at-large bid. Losing this weekend is rough, so we have to come back next weekend and be strong and play well because I know South Florida is a good team, too."

Good defense all weekend

"We played good defense, which wins games. Defense and pitching win games, but obviously our pitching wasn’t there this weekend and our hitting really except for Friday."

Getting some rest with no midweek game

"We get two days off to mentally get prepared for the next weekend. We’ll come back out next Wednesday and really work hard in BP and be right for the next weekend."

PIERCE

On being tough getting down early and trying to come back

“We saw him (Romero) a little bit when we were there, but I think he’s one of the best left-handers in the country, and he’s just a freshman. He’s got a bright future; he pitched really well, attacked the zone really well, and put a lot of good stuff on the ball.”

On if avoiding the shutout with 9th inning run being something to build on

“Not at all.”

On Duester’s performance

“Yeah, he just wasn’t sharp. He’s been a little tender, that’s why we’ve been holding him back, and that’s why we had a pretty quick trigger. He just got the ball up in some situations that got him in trouble.”

On Tulane pitching staff issuing eight walks making it tough to win

“There’s no doubt about that. Some of the guys are out there when it is 6-0 because I want to see if we have anything in the tank with those guys because I’m still searching. When you are in a situation where you can potentially be in a tough tournament, you have to find guys that can help you, and that’s what we did, but some of our base on balls came from them.”

On losing this big series and getting ready for next weekend

“For us right now, I think we are in a little bit of a zombie mentality. I think exams kick-in more than people acknowledge when you’re playing a good team like that. We are going to take Monday andTuesday off, let them finish and get prepared for their exams; let their bodies and mental side of the game just kind of get away for a couple days and rest.”

On improvement after intense batting cage practices

“I just think it’s much more mental than anything, and then you get frustrated when you’re facing good stuff like today.”

On if Tulane will face two better pitchers back to back than these two Houston ones

“No. You can talk SEC, ACC; you can talk any league in the country, when those two guys are right, they are as tough as anybody.”



On looking ahead to USF…


“South Florida is good. Their Friday night guy is one of the best guys in the league. I’m really getting tired of facing everybody that has a below 2.00 ERA, but that’s what it is, and that’s what this league is. We are in the hunt and we have a shot, so that’s how we will attack it.”



On John Gandolfo needing to improve…


“It’s not just John, it’s a few players. They’ve got to understand that there’s more to just getting hits; there’s other ways to execute and help the ball club offensively, and that’s what we have to attack.”



On a great defensive weekend with no errors…


“That’s always something you can build on, because you can take pride and confidence in a great job of playing defense. We demonstrated a great double play today. It’s tough when pitchers are walking guys as well as seeing the lopsided scores, so I commend the defense.”

After looking like it had a shot to be the top RPI team in the AAC with a sweep of Houston, Tulane lost the last two games and dropped back down to 39.

If the season ended today, I don't think Tulane would get in the NCAA field, but the season didn't end today. Tulane has now lost 4 of 6 series in the league, so winning the last two against USF at home and Memphis on the road is imperative. The Wave matches up better with both of them than Houston, which has two terrific starting pitchers who toyed with Tulane's light bats.

Here are the RPIs for the rest of the AAC teams:

Houston 21
South Florida 29
East Carolina 44
Connecticut 46
UCF 52
Memphis 57
Cincinnati 161

I think Houston is a close to lock for a bid now. Everyone else is jockeying for a spot, although Memphis was really hurt by losing two of three at home to Cincy.

With the AAC still ranking third overall among conferences, it is likely the league will get four teams in regionals. My guess is Tulane would be fourth or fifth in the pecking order right now behind Houston, South Florida, East Carolina, but it's very close after Houston. I still think Tulane needs to win the next two series to be comfortable.

Summer Elite Camps are open for registration and filling up FAST! Don't miss your chance to participate in one of the top exposure Camps in the country! If you are serious about playing college ball, want high level instruction, and your contact info and evaluation sent to EVERY college coach in the country then check us out!

For more information or to register please visit our website:

www.maximumexposurebasketball.com

Quotes after Tulane beats Houston 3-1, pulls into five-way tie for first in AAC:

DAVID PIERCE

On sending Jake Willsey to tie the game

“We just felt like there weren’t a lot of opportunities out there tonight. We were going to challenge them to make the play so we tried to do a good job by sending him and we were safe.”

On missing the chance to score in the first inning

“We really came out and we swung the bats well early, but we didn’t have anything to show for it. [Their starter] settled in with it, he’s good, but we were able to just hang in there. I felt Corey Merrill was the key. It wasn’t his prettiest night, but he got the job done.“


On being tied for first in the American

“It’s exciting. It’s exciting to be right in the middle of the hunt and that’s what you ask for the first week of May. We’re in a position where it’s anybody’s ballgame, and we’re included.”


On being 2-0 on the week after saying Wave was in position to control destiny

“It feels great. We had a great win on Tuesday, and those [kind of wins] are emotional and they’re tough to come back from. I think the kids were ready to play. It was a tough ballgame, but we did a good job.”


On Gibaut pitching so (theatrically)

“He’s just had so much stuff on the ball. If he pounds the strike zone, he’s going to be successful, and sometimes he’s successful when he doesn’t. He puts a lot of pressure on us.”

IAN GIBAUT

On struggling at first in eighth inning

"I just had to make an adjustment. I was obviously all over the place at first, but I just kind of gathered myself on the mound and said, it's go time, let's get this done. We've gotta win this game."

From last to first in less than two weeks

"It's awesome. You always know that you're never out of things. This league is all bunched up right now. Everyone is going to be able to win this league."

Significance of winning opener v. Houston

"We're looking to win every series from now on out. That's our goal. If we win every series, I think we control our own destiny."

JAKE WILLSEY

on decision to tag up on shallow fly ball

"It was not really my decision. (Third base) Coach (Sean) Allen made it. I had my back to the bag, and fairly late as the ball was descending, he said go, so I tagged, got a good jump and was able to come in safely pretty easily."

Likely would have been out if good throw, right

"It would have been close, but I still think I would have had it. It would have been closer. Aggression is really the key.

On his infield hit that got inning started

"If you put the ball in play, good things are going to happen. I had two strikes, I put the ball in play, it was a chopper and I was able to beat it out. I didn't want to strike out because then you don't have a chance for anything good to happen."

From last to first

"We feel like we're the best team in the league. We're in the best conference in the country and we feel like we're the top team in the league. We plan on being at the top when the season ends and win every series from here on out. We put ourselves in a pretty good position tonight. We beat a very good team here, a Friday night guy and were able to beat him. It took us a little while, but we were able to get the bats going eventually."

The last three weeks of the regular season should be really exciting, but Tulane still has a lot of work to do after getting in position to chase its first regional berth in seven years. A lot of work. The metrics don’t favor Tulane—yet.

UCF and Cincinnati, the two teams Tulane beat in the last two weeks, are tied for last place in the standings now. Let’s keep this hot streak in perspective. UCF, which was ranked in the top 10 nationally a month ago, is 5-10 in the AAC and has lost 12 of its last 16 games, including a 9-3 defeat to North Florida this past Tuesday. Aside from two home series wins against Memphis and UCF, Cincinnati (13-30) has been awful all year. The next three weeks, when Tulane faces conference co-leaders Houston and Memphis and USF at home before traveling to Memphis, will make or break the Wave’s at-large NCAA regional hopes.

Tulane's best wins are against SLU (twice) and UNC Wilmington, neither of which is a lock for the tournament. Tulane has a bad series loss to UC Riverside, which has an RPI of 208 and is 13-28. Tulane is 3-6 against fellow AAC contenders. At the very least, Tulane probably has to go 5-4 in the last three weeks to finish with a winning record in the AAC.

Here are my thoughts on the pecking order of the six AAC teams in contention at the moment:

1) Houston

RPI: 26.

Ranked in a couple of polls, the Cougars (29-15, 9-6) don't have a terrible loss and are 6-3 against their fellow contenders in the AAC. I'm not sold on them as a slam dunk, though, because they are 8-9 against the RPI top 50. 13-12 against the top 100 and don't have a win against a surefire tourney team. They could drop as far as sixth in the standings if they struggle in the next three weeks. After playing at Tulane this weekend, they don't have another road game, getting ECU and UConn at home.

2) Memphis

RPI: 42

Ranked by Baseball America, the Tigers (29-13, 9-6) are 11-8 against the top 50 and 16-9 against the top 100, easily the bet numbers in the league in those categories. They beat Arkansas and Ole Miss 1 out of 2/. They also still have a home series against Cincinnati, which won't help the RPI but will help their bid for the league's regular season title. The schedule is very favorable, with a trip to UCF and a home series vs. Tulane after Cincinnati. They are 6-3 against the fellow AAC contenders. So what's the nagging doubt? The non-conference schedule is not great, with the four games against Arkansas and Ole Miss the only matchups against teams above No. 50 and seven wins against bottom feeders Eastern Illinois and Alcorn State. They lost a series at Cincy. And they're Memphis, which is not supposed to carry weight but probably would in a close call. There's just not much pedigree.

3) South Florida

RPI: 24

USF's RPI is preposterous, but it usually matters to the selection committee. The Bulls (28-16-1, 9-6) have been largely uncompetitive against top notch teams, losing three games to Florida and FSU by the combined score of 44-7 and dropping two to Illinois by the combined score of 18-3 before salvaging the finale. They are 11-14 against top 100 teams but do have a win against traditional power Cal Fullterton, which struggled early in the year but is hot now. Their schedule might get them in the field even though they did not perform well against the best teams on it. They are 6-6 against fellow AAC contenders and are facing a stretch of eight straight road games. A pair of series against UCF sandwich a trip to Tulane, and they better beat their imploding in-state rivals to get on the right side of the bubble.

4) UConn

RPI: 39

The RPI loves UConn (29-13, 7-8), too, and I'm not sure why. It's best win out of conference was v. Michigan State, which is No. 31 in the RPI but unlikely to make the NCAA tournament at 25-17 right now. Aside from getting swept by FAU to start the year, the non-conference schedule is weak as it usually is for northern teams. UConn is 6-10 v. the RPI top 50 and 11-13 against the top 100 and 5-7 against fellow AAC contenders. The key for the Huskies is winning a series at ECU this weekend because they get sorry Cincinnati at home the following week and can vault into contention for the regular season title heading into a final series at Houston.

5) East Carolina

RPI: 44

Other than being tied for the conference lead, the Pirates (29-16, 9-6) don't have much going for them. The thing is, they still have a series left with Cincinnati, so winning the regular season title is a realistic possibility. They have a home series with UConn and a trip to Houston before playing Cincy. They are only 6-11 v. the top 50 and are 13-14 vs. the top 100. Their best non-conference win is against No. 53 NC State, and that won't cut it unless they finish atop the AAC standings. They are 6-6 against fellow AAC contenders.

6) Tulane

RPI: 45

Tulane's next eight games are at home and 10 of its last 11 games are against teams among the RPI top 42, so the Green Wave (27-16. 8-7) will have plenty of opportunities to add heft to its resume the rest of the way. Beating SLU tomorrow is imperative to show dominance against a fellow Louisiana bubble team, and winning 2 of 3 from Houston to erase the 2-1 series loss at Houston would be huge this weekend. Another series win at home against South Florida and its bogus RPI the following weekend would give Tulane a nice RPI boost. It needs to be 33-18 overall and 12-9 entering what could be a tough final series at Memphis.

The difference between the top six teams in the AAC is not huge, so this order can change dramatically in the next three weeks. David Pierce likes Tulane's positioning.

"It’s exactly where you want to be in late April, and that’s having an opportunity to control what you control, and we have that opportunity," he said Monday. "We talk a lot about the RPI. It’s not the bottom line, it’s only one measurement, but it tells you the quality of the opponents that we have in the next 11 games."

Coach Pierce is obviously doing a great job. He’s taken a team from last year that went 23-29 to a contender for a regional bid. And he’s done it having lost several of his best pitchers (Mapes, Leblanc, McKenzie, and France), one of his better hitters (Garner), and added essentially only one pitcher, Duester, to the group who contribute most to the team. Outstanding!

But our lack of pitching depth is starting to show. Coach clearly has started to lose confidence (deservedly so) in several members of our staff and six guys (Merrill, Gibbs, Massey, Duester, Yandel, and Gibault) have now thrown over 85% of our innings. That percentage is likely to go up. Of course, their combined ERA is 2.60 while our next three guys out of the pen (Rankin, Steele, and Gross) have a combined 4.91 ERA. So, It’s not hard to tell why we’re sticking with the “big six.” But it means we’re having to stay with guys when a better replacement might dictate a pitching change. And it means using one of our starters (Duester) in a closer role and using our “stopper’ (Gibault) for four innings to close out a game. That’s not usually what you’d like to see.

During the last few years, our top six pitchers based on innings thrown have accounted for between 68% and 76% of our innings. Of course, they didn’t pitch all that well, so maybe going to #7, #8, etc. made sense.

And, if using only a few pitchers was an insurmountable problem, I’d suggest looking at 2005, when the bats and balls were still lively and the Wave ruled the college baseball world until the last week of the College World Series. Seven pitchers threw 95% of our innings that year in 68 games and only ten pitchers saw the mound at all. Of course, those seven were named Bogusevic, Owings, Gomes, Crowel, Mohl, Latham, and Morgan. All but Crowel (due to injuries) were drafted, though Mohl chose to go into coaching rather than give pro baseball a shot.

So, if your starters, like in 2005, consistently go 7 innings and you have three more guys to close out the game, seven pitchers can do the trick. Right now, we don’t quite getting those seven innings out of the starters and we don’t have the solid #7 guy. We still have a good shot at getting a regional bid. Terrific coaching in my book.

Roll Wave!!!

Obviously, losing two out of three to Houston this weekend hurt our post season chances. And, as the season goes on, we must start winning "in conference" series as well as perform well OOC if we're to have ANY chance of making the regionals. But, we're probably not as far off as many people think.

Currently, we're 22-14 (3-6) and have an RPI of 51. Had we won one more conference game, we'd be 23-13 (4-5) and have an RPI of 42. Two more wins would have us at 24-12 (5-4), tied for second in the AAC, and have an RPI of 35. Had we gone 2-1 instead of 1-2 in our three conference weekends, we'd be 25-11 (6-3), in sole possession of second place in the conference, and with an RPI of 28. Of course, such results did not happen and it's all "spilt milk" anyhow.

To make the tourney as an "at large," we probably have to have at least a .500 record in conference. The conference is currently in 5th place from an RPI standpoint in a virtual "dead heat" with the Big 12 and PAC 10 for third through fifth place. We're all a long way from both 2nd and 6th place so we'll probably stay in that range. Since the AAC has a better OOC record than the Big 12, I think we'll eventually pass them and end up in 4th place. I don't think CUSA was ever better than 5th. We're in a surprisingly good baseball conference.

If we go 2-1 in each of our remaining five conference series and finish up 2-1 in our OOC games against USM, SELA, and LSU, we'd end up 34-20 (13-11), have an SOS in the 50's and an RPI in the 30's. I think that would get us "in." Much less would be a problem.

Can it be done? Yes, of course. But, we can't hit .204 like we did against Houston this weekend. We can't strike out ten times in 7 innings against a guy who has never fanned more than five in a game. And, though pitching is certainly not our primary problem, we need all of our pitchers to "get it together." Yandel had a 0.50 ERA last year in 13 appearances and, earlier this year, looked like a guy destined to leave after this season for the pros. We need THAT guy back. Gibault needs to work out of his problems. And Massey, Merrill, Gibbs, and Duester need to be at their best. Good performances from Rankin, Gross, and Steel would also be helpful.

According to Boyd's World's calculations, we need to win 11 more games to get to an RPI of 48 or better, 13 to get to an RPI of 32 and 17 to reach the top 16. Heck, that would possibly mean hosting in the first round. Why not dream?

But, because of our problems at the plate, which won't be solved until we bring in better hitters, I think our regional chances this year are slim. If we go 6-2 over the next two weeks, they'll be a lot brighter. If we go 4-4 or worse, they'll be essentially limited to winning the conference tournament.

Roll Wave!!!

Tulane’s latest commitment is a QB, Jack Abraham from Oxford, MS. (Source: http://sportsnola.com/recruiting-mississippi-prep-quarterback-jack-abraham-commits-tulane/) He’s about 6’0” tall with a good arm and quick feet. He’s very mobile, more to avoid the rush and occasionally run. But, he’s a passer first. He can make all of the throws and is very accurate both from the pocket and on the run. Of course, on his highlights, his primary wide receiver, #14, really sticks out. I looked him up too. He’s also entering his senior year and is rated by Rivals as the #2 WR in the country and #1 player in Mississippi. His name is Dekaylin Metcalf and he is already committed to Ole Miss. Sigh!!

Anyway, Abraham looks like a good recruit to me, though not a “game changer” from my perspective. He reminds me a lot of Zachary’s Lindsey Scott in the 2016 class in both his throwing and running, though Scott is probably a little faster and more prone to run. Of course, Scott was the MVP of Class 5A in Louisiana last year as a junior, so I consider that a flattering comparison.

Of particular interest, at least according to Rene Nadeau, is that he will graduate from high school in December and be ready for Spring practice. I think that's very important.

Highlights: http://www.hudl.com/athlete/1388386/highlights/161779377/v2


Roll Wave!!!

Ken Trahan is reporting (http://sportsnola.com/recruiting-st-charles-catholic-defensive-back-eric-lewis-commits-tulane/) that Eric Lewis of St. Charles Catholic, a DB, has committed to Tulane. Trahan has made several mistakes in his commitment stories in recent years but, if true, I think this is a good commit.

I included Lewis in my earlier analysis of 2016 prospects and may have done him an injustice by not placing him a little higher. Louisiana will probably produce close to 30 FBS DB's this year and I had him at #17. Reviewing his highlights today (http://www.hudl.com/athlete/2228085/highlights/217286378/v2), he looks really good.

Unless we have a great deal of attrition, some of it in the defensive backfield, we probably won't take more than a couple defensive backs, so this is a noteworthy commitment in by mind.

Roll Wave!!!

Here's the story.

http://www.tulanegreenwave.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/042315aaa.html

Here's the story from sports information. Apparently it took an extra day to process Julian's signing.

http://www.tulanegreenwave.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/042415aaa.html

While the nationwide Rivals.com change happens, you will be unable to post from about 11 p.m. to 5 a.m. but you will still be able to read posts.

Here are some of the new Features & Benefits for the new Rivals.com Message Boards:

1. They are a responsive design; meaning, they were designed for desktop, tablets and mobile - all in one design and all at the same URL. No need to go to a different address to get the proper version for your device

2. They have a modern, secure and actively maintained framework built for speed & stability

3. There will be no limit on Thread History, so you can reference old topics or replies at any time

4. There is Private Messaging, Social Profiles and Rich(er) Content - embeddable video, embeddable Tweets, etc

5. You now can set up alerts and follow users so you don't miss replies to topics you're participating in or miss great posts from your favorite users. In yourNews Feed you'll be able to see all of the topics, users, and content that you wish to follow.

6. Dynamic quoting system so what you select within a thread can be quoted without copying and pasting any code. You select what you want to quote and click Reply over that selection, and it will be put automatically in your reply. You can quote multiple posts and automatic quoting is set up so that you can always follow the conversation with a user forgetting to quote.

7. Improved navigation and search: quickly jump to the first unread post in a thread or to the top and bottom of each thread. Advanced search features include by keyword, date or thread title.

As usual, a viable take from Ed Daniels, one of the few "TV" media in New Orleans who cares about Tulane athletics.

My quibble would be with him lumping the three coaches together. David Pierce was a home run hire, and everyone in the know treated it as such. And I'm still waiting for the horrendous parking issues at Yulman Stadium to materialize.



http://clarionherald.info/clarion/i...n-letter-asks-tulane-president-fitts-for-help

I am on Pelicans duty this evening for AP. Here is Scott's story for The Advocate:

Stark had an awful second half of the season and did not appear happy. I'm surprised but not shocked at him leaving. He really struggled to score against AAC competition, although his buzzer-beating 30-footer against Cincinnati gave Tulane its best win in the Conroy tenure.

As everyone could see, Tulane needed a huge talent upgrade to compete in the AAC. Conroy is bringing in by far the best class in his tenure, but it could take a while for the new parts to jell.

http://www.theneworleansadvocate.co...4-123/tulane-lands-commitment-from-riversides

Not much needs to be said about tonight's loss. At this point, Tulane cannot compete with LSU, but the Wave will take its RPI bump and try to win a series at Cincinnati this weekend to stay within range of a regional berth.

David Pierce has done a lot of great things in his first year as coach, but he can't keep his guys from getting in a funk at the plate when they struggle early. It's been going on for two years to a degree I've never seen with any team in 35 years of following college baseball. One hit against nine pitchers is preposterously inept.

The good news in Cincinnati does not have good pitching. Tulane has fared well against teams like that all year, and I don't mean it as a backhanded compliment. Last year, Tulane could not hit any pitching. This year, it has been very good in midweek games not involving LSU precisely because it matches up well with midweek starters.

The AAC remains third in conference RPI, ahead of the Pac-12 and Big 12 and behind only the SEC and ACC.

I don't like coming off as a skeptic, and I recognize the AAC is a really good baseball league this year, but some of the RPIs are higher than the actual play warrants.

South Florida is 21st nationally. The Bulls lost two games to FSU by the combined score of 31-4. They lost to Florida 13-3. They lost a series at highly ranked Illinois 2-1, which probably helped their RPI even though the first game was 13-1 and the second was 5-2 before they salvaged the final game 8-5. Their next-best non-conference win was against Cal Fullterton, which is 20-18. I don't know. Unless USF stays on top of the AAC--and a home series against league weakling Cincinnati put them there--I probably wouldn't put them in the NCAA tournament if I were picking the field.

UConn is 33rd. Its only non-conference wins against teams from the RPI top 100 were v. Michigan State and Boston College, neither of which is likely to make the NCAA tournament. It was swept by a really good FAU team to start the year. It also lost to Hartford (280) and Siena (236) before going 6-6 in the AAC. That's good enough for No. 33?

Houston I'll buy at No. 31, but the Cougars face road series at USF and Tulane after losing their first two conference road series at UCF and Memphis.

Tulane is 44th and the only team in the league with a winning record against the RPI top 50 at 7-6 (beat SLU twice, beat UNC Wilmington, lost to LSU, went 4-5 v. top 50 in AAC), but I'm not sure wins over SLU and UNC Wilmington will carry as much weight as wins against teams from the SEC or ACC.

Slumping UCF, which was being talked about as a regional host two weeks ago, is 47th. That's about right considering the Knights' tough non-conference schedule. They've played a whopping 19 games against RPI top 50 teams but are 8-11 in those games.

Memphis, which is 54th, has nice series wins against Houston and UCF at home but lost to Cincy on the road and played a weak non-conference schedule. The Tigers have the weakest conference schedule, too, because they have two series with Cincy.

ECU, which is 59th, is 2-8 against RPI top 100 teams out of the AAC, with the wins against No. 92 St. John's and No. 90 Campbell. That won't get it done unless the Pirates finish at or near the top of the AAC standings.

To sum up, I don't see any team in the league that is close to a lock or even probable for the NCAA field unless the NCAA pays slavish attention to the RPI, which it sometimes does. But because of the overall strength of the league, at least three teams will get in, and the tournament in Clearwater should be wild. I will be there.

No one worked harder or was a better character guy than Keith Pinckney, but he struggled all year as a freshman after coming in as a touted recruit for Ed Conroy at a position where previous freshman excelled. I got so down on his on-court play that one of his teammates' mothers admonished me on twitter.

I certainly thought he could still develop into a good player, but his ball-handling skills were weak for a point guard and Tulane has a ton of depth in the backcourt anyway. He is the third player to leave after the season and the only one who had really any shot to crack the rotation next year, although he probably saw the writing on the wall about his limited future.

HIs departure leaves Tulane with one available scholarship, contrary to what I posted on another thread before he left as I've apparently lost the ability to count this week.

The May 1 game.

Link

This was a terrific weekend for Tulane baseball. Other than Rankin (will we see him again this year?), our pitching was exceptional. We shut out one of the best hitting teams in college baseball and only allowed them one earned run in 26 innings, not counting the ninth inning on Saturday. Even counting that ninth inning debacle, six earned runs in 27 innings is not too shabby either.

Other than Hope's error to lead off the game on Saturday, our defense was also stellar. We made a number of really good plays and, other than the one error, didn't botch any routine opportunities.

We ran the bases as though we knew what we were doing, though our bunting has regressed badly. We're four of our last eight in successfully laying down a sacrifice bunt, and that's not counting fouling off several attempts that put us into the hole at bat.

And, at least on Sunday, we showed the capability of hitting the lower end of a team's pitching staff. Our eleven hits was the most since the midweek game against Nichols and the Saturday game against ECU when we face their normal Sunday starter. Of the eleven games in which we produced ten or more hits this year, eight were against Sunday or mid-week pitching. Two of the other three were against Pepperdine to open the season. We need to do better against the Friday and Saturday starters.

One game or one weekend does not make a season, but this was fun.

Roll Wave!!

It was not the most revealing interview, but here it is.

Harris is a big get for Conroy and his staff, giving them two guys in the incoming class who are as good or better in rep than anyone they have signed in his tenure.

A backcourt of Harris, Stark, Dabney, Pinckney, Mack, Reynolds and Morgan could be pretty effective.

The frontcourt remains awfully thin, but Osetkowski, Henson and Blake Paul are building blocks. Look for Stanley Roberts Jr. to join Hearlihy and Liberman as departures. Roberts Jr. was considered a long shot to ever be a D1 factor, and his first year pretty much proved he was a no shot. Hearlihy had some potential and saw the floor well but never seemed on balance, which two years into your career usually means you can't play. Liberman was not good and also delusional, feeling like he was being held back from a potential NBA career by college coaches (first at Northwestern, now Tulane) who did not see his ability. What ability?

Tulane now has 10 players who can contribute against AAC competition, although I don't want to overdo the optimism here. Dabney and Stark have to shoot a heck of a lot better, Pinckney and Mack need to improve significantly in the offseason, Morgan is an unknown quantity, freshmen often go through growing pains and for as much as Conroy talked about Reynolds' injury hurting the Wave (and I believe it did), he was not playing well before he went out with his hand injury.

It was not the most revealing interview, but here it is.

Harris is a big get for Conroy and his staff, giving them two guys in the incoming class who are as good or better in rep than anyone they have signed in his tenure.

A backcourt of Harris, Stark, Dabney, PInckney, Mack, Reynolds and Morgan could be pretty effective.

The frontcourt remains awfully thin, but Osetkowski, Henson and Blake Paul are building blocks. Look for Stanley Roberts Jr. to join Hearlihy and Liberman as departures. Roberts Jr. was considered a long shot to ever be a D1 factor, and his first year pretty much proved he was a no shot. Hearlihy had some potential and saw the floor well but never seemed on balance, which two years into your career usually means you can't play. Liberman was not good and also delusional, feeling like he was being held back from a potential NBA career by college coaches (first at Northwestern, now Tulane) who did not see his ability. What ability?

Tulane now has 10 players who can contribute against AAC competition, although I don't want to overdo the optimism here. Dabney and Stark have to shoot a heck of a lot better, Pinckney and Mack need to improve significantly in the offseason, Morgan is an unknown quantity, freshmen often go through growing pains and for as much as Conroy talked about Reynolds' injury hurting the Wave (and I believe it did), he was not playing well before he went out with his hand injury.






This post was edited on 4/16 12:04 AM by Guerry Smith

Link

I have the same concerns about our receiving corps. We are woefully thin and, while we are young, I have not seen the "ability" some see. Lack of separation and dropped balls tend to reflect problems of skill, while missed assignment and improper alignment tend to suggest inexperience. Hopefully, all of the problems will be solved with experience.
Nonetheless, we are far too few at the position, though a new commitment to the tight ends and more "downfield" throws to running backs could alleviate some of the issues.

I'd like to see us sign a big blocking tight end this year and at least two wide receivers in the 6'2" range with speed. A lot will depend on how many available slots we eventually have.

Roll Wave!!!

Eight Tulane players are at the Saints tryout camp today -Doss, Nixon, Donnelly, Marfisi, Butler, LeBeau, Gilbert and Rush.

This is the route Derrick Strozier took last year when he almost made it to the roster or at least the practice squad.

Other than Doss and possibly Nixon, this may be the only chance for the guys on this list.

Good article Guerry and I agree w/most of what you say. As I posted in the other thread I am one of the ones holding out hope that we still make a regional. No doubt there is improvement. The problem is that this conference is much better competition than what we saw last year. I'm not sure if we are improved enough yet to overcome that. Even if we don't I agree that better things will come our way sooner than later.