Mike Aresco, Rhett Lashlee and Willie Fritz spoke today previewing Saturday's AAC Championship Game
ARESCO
On if he anticipates further expansion after Army and if has discussed anything with Oregon State and Washington State:
"Adding Army was not expansion in the sense we're losing SMU to the ACC next year and we wanted to get back to 14 if we could find the right program, and Army speaks for itself as a tremendous addition to this conference. We didn't want to play with an odd number of teams where you have byes in November, and that causes all sorts of controversy. There are other issues, too, about not having an even number of teams. We kicked the tires a while back on Washington State and Oregon State and had some serious initial dialog, but the more we talked about it with our membership, the more we realized the travel in that scenario, especially in the Olympic sports and men's and women's basketball was going to be too big a burden. We don't have the resources that for instance UCLA or USC or Oregon or Washington or even Stanford and Cal where they will be traveling their teams across the country constantly in the future. We didn't feel we had the ability to do that, and if you can't charter with a lot of the Olympic sports, you are looking at 22-, 24-hour trips and you're putting your student-athletes through an awful lot. It's not the easiest thing to get to Pullman or Corvalis. We ultimately said this isn't going to work. If geography was different, it might have worked out had they wanted to be with us. They did express some interest, but we don't know what level that ultimately was, but we did talk to them about it, and ultimately I let them know before we announced that we were not going to go west. Again, the burden and the expense but mostly on the student-athletes, that's the real issue. We closed it down. We wish them well. Ultimately they'll figure something out."
On if SMU would be deserving of New Year's Six spot and whether Mustangs would actually get it if they beat Tulane:
"I really do think they would be deserving and I hope that they would get it. Without question. Strength of schedule is critical. One of their competitors literally is like 133 at the total bottom (Liberty). No P5 opponents. Records of 2-9 and 3-7. Eight of the teams they played had losing records, and we have had a really tough nonconference schedule. SMU played at Oklahoma. It was competitive midway though the fourth quarter. Let me ask you the teams that would be potentially competing with for New Year's Day would have done that at Oklahoma. And then at TCU, that's a rivalry game, and it was at TCU. That's a reputable P5 team, which has had an up and down season, but they gave Texas all the wanted. They are a real team. The point is both SMU and Tulane beat a Memphis team that lost by 7 to Missouri andthat was in St. Louis. That was essentially a road game. I could talk all day about this. SMU scored 52 points against Navy in the first half and 52 against Tulsa in the first half. What they've done in the conference is nothing short of remarkable. Obviously they don't know the status of Preston Stone, but should they win on Saturday, absolutely deserving. Our league as far as I'm concerned has the four best teams in the G5 with Memphis just being edged out by the other two and UTSA an outstanding team that was dominating its competition and then just ran into a tough game at Tulane and lost to an outstanding Tulane team with a veteran quarterback, a great coach in Willie Fritz and had a bunch of turnovers, which is not characteristic of them. Whoever wins this game will be very worth. If Tulane wins, it it almost a certainty they are the team, but if SMU should win, they should be the team, and I'll make that point all week."
RHETT LASHLEE
On update on Preston Stone:
"He had appointment actually today with a specialist to confirm what we all feared, is he broke his lower leg, so he'll be out for the remainder of the season. Really unfortunate for him. He was having a fantastic season and may have played his best two halves of football the second half at Memphis and the first half last week. He was 14 of 19 for 322 and two touchdowns in about a quarter-and-a-half. It was the most yards a quarterback's thrown in a quarter since 2019, what he did in the first quarter, so he was really clicking. His growth and development all year was exceptional, so we're really proud of how he performed. We've got some great quarterbacks in this league, but I think you could argue he's just as good as any of them. We're going to miss him. Fortunately for us, there's probably not a lot of teams that if they lost their starting quarterback, could feel as good as we do. We've got a guy who won a state championship just two years ago here in Dallas in Kevin Jennings. He's played in big-time moments this year. He came in when Preston got knocked out in the Rice game and led us on a big scoring drive in the last few minutes that was necessary to secure that win, and last year when Tanner (Mordecai) got knocked out, he came in and led us on a 90-yard touchdown drive against Memphis. You can't replace the experience and the production of how Preston was playing, but that's not what we're asking Kevin to do. We feel like we have a good team, and if Kevin will just show up and be Kevin that he's more than enough and we're excited about it."
On exact injury:
"It's the fibula, so kind of the upper ankle, lower leg. At least from everything we've been told, it's really clean. It's something that he should make a 100-percent recovery from. I don't know that he'll be back for the beginning of spring ball, but by middle of March he should be almost back up throwing and doing everything and should have a full summer and offseason and be just fine for the future. He's going to be OK long term."
On demeanor of Jennings:
"It's just kind of one of the strengths of who he is. He's just very even keel. He's the same guy every day. That's what helped him win the first DISD state title in 50 or 60 years at South Oak High School here in Dallas. It's what turned us on to recruit him when we got hired for the job, and he's been that way ever since he got here. He's super talented. He can throw it. He can run it. It's been really hard. We've got so much depth on our team, we feel like at a lot of positions this year we've had co-starters, and quarterback's one of those positions it's hard to do that, but if you could, he's talented enough to have been playing. You don't always think that about your backup. There's usually a reason they are a backup. And just the way he's handled the times he's had to come in. That's the hard thing about being a backup--you don't get the reps during the week and then you're thrown in, and he's handled that well. It's a little different when you've never started, so they'll be some probably different nerves that he'll overcome that we'll all had if we played, but that's kind of been who we are this year as a team. Next-man-up mentality. Offensively we've got a lot of good players, but it's been a different running back and receiver each week, and we had our first receiver finally have a 100-yard game in week 12 last week. Same thing on defense. I think we have over 20 guys on our defense with over 20 tackles, but at least going into the last week, we don't have a single guy in the top 25 of the league, so it's been a next-man-up mentality when guys get banged up, and it will be no different with Kevin."
On what clicked differently with defense:
"That's what we felt like from my time as OC and then even being back in the first year (as head coach), if we wanted to have a chance to compete for the championship, we couldn't just have top-10 offenses. We had to have a championship caliber defense. You look at Tulane and what they did last year, they had a championship caliber defense coupled with a big-time quarterback and running back and really good receivers, and the've done it again this year. You look at UTSA, a team that coming down the stretch they had a really good defense this year. The reality is we haven't had a top 40 defense at SMU in 40 years, so we felt like that had to change if we wanted to change our overall result as a team, and our staff did a great job. We had some really good returning players like Elijah Chatman, DeVere Levelston, Nelson Paul and Isaiah Nwokobia and on and on,, but we went out and were very aggressive in recruiting. We brought in some transfer defensive linemen that really stepped up and made a huge impact and some transfer DBs, so we feel like we upgraded our roster and added value to those guys returning on defense, and then at the same time you've got to give Scott Simons and our defensive staff a ton of the credit. Scott's.a guy when I hired him that had back-to-back top 15 defenses at Liberty, so he just needed to get one year here, get his system in place and maybe fill some holes like we did, and they were able to put guys in position and create a lot of confidence. Fortunately we were able to play some really good defense this year, and that helped us get here."